
Sofia Airport (On the Hunt for my Stolen Identity)
In keeping with my new fascination with acts of translation, I want to visit two older projects and talk about identity.
**********
Part One: Inspiring/Thinking/Reading
I have recently become addicted to the podcast Philosophy Bites. In particular, the interview with Christopher Shields about personal identity is beyond satisfying and thought-provoking. (http://nigelwarburton.typepad.com/philosophy_bites/2008/11/christopher-shi.html)
In the interview, Shields outlines what makes a person the same person day to day, over time. He gracefully dissects the history of the concept of personal identity from the Ancient Greeks, to Locke, to the contemporary implications of what it means to be the same person when we wake up every morning.
Shields begins with the dichotomy of religious/personal identity (how we see ourselves as responsible, moral beings over time) and judicial identity (the physical, corporeal equation of one person = one body). The judicial context is, seemingly, the base level for our concepts of identity over time. I am one person because I am one physical quantity of matter everyday.
However, this easily breaks down with the idea that our bodies are constantly changing. How are we to say that I am the same thing when I am constantly physically changing over time? (Keep in mind, every 7 years you have a completely new set of skin cells covering you!)
There has to be another factor; a psychological dimension intrinsic to our definition of identity. Enter Locke, his ideas of psychological beings, and his example of the prince and the peasant. Imagine a prince and a peasant both wake up one morning in there respective houses/palaces and go to the mirror in their bathrooms. The prince sees the face of the peasant and the peasant sees the face of the prince. According to Locke, they have rather obviously swapped bodies – because – the prince remembers being a prince and the peasant being a peasant.
In this way the body = self equation is decoupled. Now, self = psychological subject of “I”. Or, more indirectly: human beings receive the predicate of being responsible, or doing, or suffering, interacting with other psychological subjects. Responsibility to one’s self as a subject equates with continuing sense of self over time.
Memory then becomes the key to identity. I am myself because I remember doing things as myself.
But there is a problem with this emphasis on the responsible psychological subject constituting the basis of identity: What if you commit a crime and do not remember it? What if your psychological self is transplanted into another body? Cloned?
**********

Stolen Identity Project at Georgia State
Part Two: Practicing Ideas
Both of these projects ended up being about trying to translate my experiences as a conscious subject that is multifaceted, psychologically diverse and always seeing that my definition is shifting.
Project One: Stolen Identity Project.
Here’s the official blurb:
In early December 2005, individuals stole my identity using the Internet in the Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia. Sensitive information regarding my checking account was stolen, allowing these individuals to travel throughout the region, withdrawing funds from ATMs and utilizing a forged VISA card while posing as me. During the months of May and June 2006 I traveled to sites within the countries of Macedonia and Bulgaria where usage of my bank account occurred. I documented through photography the places and transactions that resulted from my stolen identity. By doing so, I hoped to reunite my conceptual, digital self with my actual, physical identity.
My travels to Bulgaria definitely fall within the conversation of what constitutes an individual in contemporary society. Am I a person simply because I have a VISA number? Am I person because I buy things?
According to technology that shapes and influences our lives – the answer is yes. When we are part of the system (even if it is simply by accident) we are considered an individual. Maybe this neo-liberal capitalist/consumer subject is now the equivalent of Locke’s psychological being?
I hate to think that.

Plovdiv, Bulgaria (On the Hunt for my Stolen Identity)
Project Two: First Things
My first year of graduate school I started making projects that played with the habitual parts of my identity. These are the things that I could control and shape, but were somehow always on the periphery of my consciousness.
For example, in the First Things project I trained myself to instinctually wake up and take a photograph in the direction I was looking upon regaining consciousness. I’ve always felt that there are a few moments at the beginning of the day when I haven’t yet tapped into my history, my memories, and the other things that make me who I am in the Locke/memory/psychological way of seeing identity.
For 27 days I was able to make myself take photographs without thinking. Hoping that somewhere in there I would be able to glimpse my “basic being”.
Unfortunately the images from the project have been lost.
But I do have the last image I took. On the beach. In Galveston, TX when I felt like I nolonger needed to try to photograph that part of myself.

Galveston, A moment after the First Things Project